Home Politics Today Two APC ministers, Fashola and Keyamo disagree over naira redesign policy 

Two APC ministers, Fashola and Keyamo disagree over naira redesign policy 

0
New Naira Notes , Why CBN Extends Deadline for Old Naira Notes
A photo file of New Naira Notes
Advertisement

Two APC ministers, Babatunde Fashola and Festus Keyamo have disagreed over naira redesign policy 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola (SAN), has said the directive of President Muhammadu Buhari that the old N200 notes be recirculated until April 10, 2023, while the old N500 and N1,000 cease to be legal tender, was not a direct affront to Supreme Court.

Advertisement

 

Fashola, who is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), contrary to a recent comment by the Minister of State, Labour, and Employment, Mr. Festus Keyamo (SAN) in which he had faulted President Muhammadu Buhari’s directive on old currencies.

 

Fashola at the weekend argued that the directive of the president was not a direct affront to Supreme Court that had temporarily halted the move to ban the old currencies by February 10, 2023.

 

Advertisement

Speaking to our correspondent , the former Lagos State governor maintained that the president only took the step to help ameliorate the pains of Nigerians who were becoming the unintended victims of the policy.

 

 

Keyamo, who is also a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and spokesperson for the All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Council, had in an interview, said the president was wrongly advised to make the pronouncement in a nationwide broadcast.

 

Advertisement

READ ALSO: BREAKING: APC Spokesperson, Keyamo moves for Atiku’s arrest, trial over alleged corruption

 

Advertisement

According to Keyamo, although Buhari had good intentions for the naira redesign policy, he was wrongly advised. He had also said he would have advised the president to comply with the Supreme Court order, which was to recirculate all the old notes until they decide on the matter.

 

“My view is that the president acted honestly, without intention to slight the Supreme Court, but he may have acted on wrong advice. I did not give that advice, it’s not my responsibility. I do not know who gave that advice.

Advertisement

 

 

“In his speech, he acknowledged that there were certain matters in court. So, he thought he was playing safe by saying okay before you decide these matters in court, may I just provide some middle ground, so that the country is burning, there are riots everywhere, so let me just try and provide some succour for people, whilst acknowledging the matters are in court.

Advertisement

 

 

Now, if I were to advise him, I would have advised differently. I would have advised him to comply with the terms of the order of the Supreme Court. All the notes should circulate, for now, all the notes. All the old notes should circulate side by side with the new notes for now, because that is the order of the Supreme Court,” he had said.

Advertisement

 

According to him, the matter was not discussed at the Federal Executive Council.

 

The comments by Fashola came just as a viral video of some residents of Ogun State being bribed ahead of Saturday’s election with the old N1,000 notes. Those who received the money in white envelopes with the logo of the state government, however, expressed concerns that commercial banks were no longer accepting the currency. But someone suspected to be a government official, who spoke in Yoruba, was heard assuring the beneficiaries that they should go ahead and spend the money, adding that the government had vowed to ensure that banks in the state collect the old banknotes.

 

Fashola claimed that the recent nationwide broadcast by Buhari on the ongoing naira redesign policy was not a direct affront to the Supreme Court.

 

 

He stated that although the naira swap policy needed to be reviewed, the president took the decision because he had seen the suffering many Nigerians were facing and not to spite the apex court.

 

Fashola explained, “Let me say that in a democracy where there is a right to speak freely, there’s bound to be a divergence of views, as you have had. But I think that the principle about respecting and awaiting the outcome of a court decision sometimes has been stretched, if I may use that word.

 

“There is also a lot of jurisprudence and scholarship about the boundaries of contempt in actions done and in things said. If I shut the door on your finger, and you went to court to say that the court should direct me to remove or open the door, do I say let’s wait for the outcome of the court decision when you are in pain, and people are in pain?

 

 

“The question to ask is if I attempt to open that door, would you, the person in pain, say I was acting in contempt or would you gladly have me open the door and then go back to the court and say the matter we have resolved it?

 

 

“And that is another angle to look at this thing because I think that whatever interventions the president sought to make were interventions in response to the very palpable pain and I think he said that much in his speech about the unintended consequences of the policy.

 

 

Noting that his argument should not be misunderstood for misbehaviour while a case was pending in court, Fashola stated that the conversation around the matter had helped enrich Nigeria’s democracy. He explained that it had also shown the APC presidential candidate, Tinubu, and others that had spoken up as people of courage who would not sit in their comfort zones when the people were suffering.

 

Fashola said the fact that recent Central Bank governors in Nigeria tended to get into trouble close to elections should spur a review of the system to look at how political the apex bank had become. He stressed that although the Central Bank had a right to implement the current naira redesign policy, some of the reasons adduced by the bank were outside the law.

 

So the question to then ask is, has a law been used for a policy seeking to achieve an objective that is not within the law? And this is an invitation to parliament and I think this is the time to step up and say, have our politics left our central banking-related laws behind?”

 

The minister argued that what happened was a mop-up of Nigeria’s currency and not a swap, arguing that the central bank may not have expected the outcome.

 

“It seems to me that the central bank does not intend or contemplate a mop-up policy, it actually contemplates in my view, a swap of notes,” he added, pointing out that the central bank may have overreached itself.

 

 

Fashola said Nigeria changed notes some 15 years ago, stressing that it did not cause this much pain, but wondered why the present case was causing untold hardship. He stated that the current development might negatively affect the banking system in Nigeria. He said everyone must work together to ensure that the effect on the banks was mitigated.

Advertisement
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of Ejes Gist Media Limited. For any rights infringements or takedown requests, please contact us at [email protected].
Advertisement

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here