Labour Unions Express Skepticism Over Government’s N5 Billion Palliative for Fuel Subsidy Removal
The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) have broken their silence following the federal government’s announcement of a N5 billion palliative package to states in light of the removal of fuel subsidies.
The Federal Government stated that it had approved N5 billion for each state and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to enable them to procure food items for distribution to the poor in their respective regions.
Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State revealed this development after the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting held at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
Read Also :Â NLC Warns of Immediate Nationwide Strike Without Notice Amid Proposed N720 Fuel Price
While on the surface the move may appear to be aimed at providing relief to the most vulnerable, organized labor has voiced concerns over the effectiveness and transparency of the plan.
Labour leaders have criticized the federal government’s decision, pointing out that state governors may not allocate the funds appropriately, thereby limiting the intended benefits for the poor.
The NLC President, Joe Ajaero, expressed doubts about the initiative, asserting that N5 billion multiplied by 36 states would only amount to around N2,000 per person for the 133 million Nigerians classified as multi-dimensionally poor.
Ajaero questioned whether this nominal amount was truly a cause for celebration and suggested that the gesture might not be a sufficient palliative measure.
Additionally, Ajaero highlighted that many state governors had not adhered to minimum wage regulations, raising concerns about their willingness to properly manage the funds.
Also Read :Â Farida Sobowale Rescued from Suicide Attempt at Third Mainland Bridge
The Assistant National Secretary-General of the NLC, Mr. Chris Onyeka, echoed these sentiments, stressing that the money might not reach the intended recipients due to past instances of mismanagement.
Tommy Etim, the Deputy National President of TUC, drew parallels to previous situations where government relief efforts were not effectively distributed to those in need.
Etim proposed the establishment of a body to oversee the implementation and distribution of the palliatives, ensuring transparency and accountability in the process.
The skepticism expressed by these prominent labour unions reflects a deep-seated concern about the transparency and efficiency of the government’s efforts.
As the discussions continue, the focus remains on ensuring that any palliative measures genuinely benefit those most affected by economic challenges and that proper oversight is in place to prevent any misallocation of resources.
